judge dismisses Lance Armstrong's lawsuit against USADA

A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit Monday due to Lance Armstrong quickly trying to stop the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency for the extraction of cycling champion of his seven Tour de France titles.

The legal team said that Armstrong intends to resubmit the case Tuesday.

District Judge Sam Sparks of the United States in Austin, Texas, dismissed the original deposit of "breach of the federal rules of civil procedure."

USADA has accused Armstrong as a central figure in a doping conspiracy a year that has driven her career and covers the procedure during their run of titles in the Tour de France 1999-2005.

Armstrong has always denied the use of doping substances, citing hundreds of drug tests negative for over a decade.

Sparks has criticized the law, due to the inclusion of "accusations that are completely irrelevant to the claims of Armstrong Armstrong - and the court must assume, have been included only to increase coverage this case, and to incite public opinion against the accused. "

In 111 pages of storage, Armstrong's lawyers that a possible USADA arbitration hearing as "kangaroo" court proceedings.

"Contrary to popular belief of apparent Armstrong, the allegations presented in the district courts of the United States are not press releases, blogs, internet, or pieces of investigative journalism," Sparks said in his refusal to three pages.

Tim Armstrong, the lawyer Herman and then said, "When," Judge, "speaks, I listen. Not change the legal issues involved or any of the aid we seek. Certainly listen to what he said Judge Sparks. I intend to conform my conduct with precision. "

The lawsuit claimed the original CEO Travis Tygart of USADA has led to Armstrong a "belief that the USADA is above the U.S. Constitution", urging the court to issue an order for Saturday and made the USADA review, its jurisdictional rights and if the statute of limitations rules apply.

Saturday is the deadline to decide whether Armstrong used to accept his sentence to dispose of his Tour de France titles or fight the charges arbitration is likely to occur in autumn.

In the lawsuit, the legal team rider Armstrong re-examine the claim that the federal investigator Jeff Novitzky Tygart and have followed the cyclist with a "vengeance", including the evidence presented to a jury in Los Angeles ended without criminal charges.

"Parts of the defendant's agent Novitzky Tygart with a highly publicized obsession with" getting "Mr. Armstrong," the lawyers wrote.

"Tygart Respondent apparently believed that the USADA is an important case to bring against a" big fish "to justify their existence."

The lawyers also argued the USADA has cut "secret agreements" with his former club to secure the testimony of Armstrong against a change in a reduction of sentence.

Tygart has released a statement saying that the actions of its quasi-governmental, which has the power to bring the awards.

"USADA has been built by athletes on the principles of honesty and integrity," Tygart said. "Like the previous cases, designed to obscure the truth, this claim has no merit and are confident that the courts will respect the rules provide that the full constitutional due process and are designed to protect the rights of clean athletes and the integrity of sport. "